Megan Lobdell, Engineer; Brian Croop, Laboratory Director; and Hubert Lobo, President, DatapointLabs Technical Center for Materials.
Presented at SPE Automotive TPO Conference, October 4, 2016; Troy, MI USA.
Strengthening the materials core of manufacturing enterprises
Materials insight
Finite element analysis of plastics contains assumptions and uncertainties that can affect simulation accuracy. It is useful to quantify these effects prior to using simulation for real-life applications. A mid-stage validation uses a controlled physical test on a standardized part to compare results from simulation to physical experiment. These validations do not use real-life parts but carefully designed geometries that probe the accuracy of the simulation; the geometries themselves can be tested with boundary conditions that can be simulated correctly. In one study, a quasi-static three-point bending experiment of a standardized parallel ribbed plate is performed and simulated, using Abaqus. A comparison of the strain fields resulting from the complex stress state on the face of the ribs obtained by digital image correlation (DIC) vs. simulation is used to quantify the simulation's fidelity. In a second study, a dynamic dart impact experiment is validated using LS-Dyna probing the multi-axial deformation of a polypropylene until failure.
Megan Lobdell, Engineer; Brian Croop, Laboratory Director; and Hubert Lobo, President, DatapointLabs Technical Center for Materials.
Presented at SPE Automotive TPO Conference, October 4, 2016; Troy, MI USA.
Further reading